Thursday, September 1, 2016

The Dark Knight (2008): Favourite Films Series






The Dark Knight (2008): Favourite Films Series


Spoilers ahead.


Every generation will have their own Batman. Adam West, Michael Keaton, Kevin Conroy, Ben Affleck. But for me, no matter who is putting on the cape and cowl, I’ll always think of Christian Bale, and the second entry in Christopher Nolan’s trilogy of Batman films. There have been plenty of great superhero movies in the past couple decades, but for me, The Dark Knight is, hands down the best superhero movie ever made, because it transcends being simply a superhero movie and is something even greater. 

Back in the summer of 2008, I wasn’t a Batman fan. I straight-up didn’t even like Batman. He was just this mopey guy dressed all in black running around at night using silly gadgets to take out bad guys, and if that wasn’t the image I had in my mind, it was that of Adam West’s campy Batman teamed with Robin hitting villains with exaggerated Biffs! and Thuds! thrown in. 

The first trailer for The Dark Knight indicated to me they were trying some new weird take on the caped crusader and his most-famous arch nemesis, The Joker. I thought it looked dumb and absolutely no fun. It wasn’t even called Batman! At that point in my life I was all about Marvel. Having just seen Iron Man a couple months earlier, I thought DC heroes were inferior. 

But then when my best friend and I decided to go to the movies and the only thing playing was The Dark Knight, we thought we might as well go see it, to see what all the fuss was about, because word on the street was extremely positive. So with the mindset that I didn’t like Batman and DC was inferior to Marvel and this was a brand-new standalone attempt to remake Batman, I sat down in a packed theater in the middle of a sweltering July day, and watched The Dark Knight. Needless to say, it floored me. 

Sometimes it can feel like certain movies are only enjoyable upon re-watching because they trigger sentimental, nostalgic feelings that make you unable to detect flaws or see it in any other light. I’ve seen this movie dozens upon dozens of times, and every time, I find something new to appreciate about it. I’ve picked this movie over and scrutinized it—just as many, many others have—and I still find it’s damn near flawless. But just for fun, here’s a shortlist of things I don’t like about it.

There’s a shot of Batman on the bat pod where he drives up a wall, flips around, and lands facing the other way. It’s only half a second, but is very clearly cgi, and kind of sticks out. There’s lots of foreshadowing that’s really obvious, especially when you re-watch it, but again, a minor point, one that doesn’t compromise the enjoyment of the foreshadowed events. Is Christian Bale’s gravelly Batman voice a bit silly? Yes, but it’s too much fun to imitate to be called a flaw. Finally, after Harvey Dent becomes Two-Face and half his mouth is pretty much gone, his speech doesn’t change, which I think it would if half your lips and cheek were removed. Also his one eye has no eyelid and there’s not a single shot of him squirting Vizine in it, would it not be totally dried out and irritating him? Must be in a deleted scene. But in all seriousness, this is again a very minor point, and not the most unrealistic thing in the movie. Batman turns everyone’s cell phone into a tracking thing to map the whole city? In a largely realistic and grounded movie, these things are slightly hard to believe, but they still work in the context of the movie. 

The list of things I love about this movie is too long to cover in its entirety, so I’ll just hit on the main ones. To begin with, the opening bank heist scene is an absolutely incredible way to kick things off. Right from the get-go, there’s tension, action, betrayal, surprise, intrigue, and it establishes this is a crime thriller, not just a Batman movie (it’s also feels like a horror movie sometimes too, probably another reason I love it). We get a sample of Heath Ledger’s Joker and some info on him, then get to Batman and a great action scene with him chasing down copycats and Scarecrow. Of course the first time I saw this, I didn’t know the guy wearing a burlap mask was supposed to be Scarecrow, because I hadn’t yet seen Batman Begins and didn’t realize The Dark Knight was a sequel. But that’s yet another testament to the strength of this movie, it works as a superior sequel, but also stands enough on its own that you don’t even need to have seen Batman Begins to get it (for the most part). 

The action is sometimes criticized, not just in this movie but the whole trilogy, as being somewhat cumbersome and uncoordinated. I have to disagree. First off, there actually isn’t that much hand-to-hand fighting to begin with, but when there is, it isn’t some blurry shaky cam crap, it’s easy to follow and feels real. You can feel every punch Batman lands, and every hit he takes. Something else I didn’t fully pick up on until much later was how much stronger this version of the Joker was than past incarnations. Ledger’s Joker is swift, tough, (as demonstrated when he slams that guy’s head on the pencil) and puts up a good physical fight against Batman, especially considering he doesn’t have any of the gadgets or armour Batman has. 

I understand the argument that Joker steals the movie, and while he’s most likely the one you’ll be thinking about after the credits roll, he’s still just a piece of this incredibly well-assembled puzzle. Batman himself has more than a few awesome moments, and the supporting cast is completely solid. 

Another thing that contributes to Joker really standing out is his theme music, which is exciting, scary, and, like the theme for Jaws, simple but memorable. I often hear more mature movie fans complain that movie franchises don’t bring back the old music queues, whether it be for Batman or Superman or Godzilla, but in this case, I think hearing Danny Elfman’s score from 1989’s Batman would just sound out of place. Hans Zimmer’s score perfectly fits with the look and tone of the Dark Knight trilogy, and in none of the movies is it more effective than here. 

Speaking of 1989’s Batman, not to knock on that movie (which I think is great in its own right) or compare it too closely to The Dark Knight, but that Batman/Joker story was pretty simple and straight-forward, though it still worked. But the story in The Dark Knight is significantly more layered. It’s just complex enough to require viewers to pay close attention, but not so complicated that you’ll get lost (like some of Nolan’s other movies). It weaves storylines together seamlessly, and I love how at the heart of the movie is the organic and believable conflict between Joker and Batman. 

But perhaps the thing I love the most about The Dark Knight, and the thing that makes it continually awesome every time I re-watch it, is the more I learn about the history of the character and the more I watch his other cinematic adventures, whether it be the realm of comics or animation or the new DC cinematic universe, the more elements I realize they nailed in what I truly think is the best Batman movie yet made. As I said in my intro, every generation will have their own Batman, but in terms of storytelling and filmmaking, The Dark Knight really is the best Batman movie ever. 

Monday, August 29, 2016

Top Ten Worst Movie Titles: C.C.C Issue #56



Top Ten Worst Movie Titles



A picture says a thousand words, but what does a movie title say? Well, it can be a simple, to-the-point word that sums up everything you need to know about the premise, or it could be a phrase, or a line from the movie, or a place, or a person, and so on and so forth. 


But sometimes, the writers or producers or marketers or whoever it is who came up with the title really craps the bed and that title is forever attached to that movie, whether the movie is good or bad. 


These ten instances, though, are the most inexcusable. A title should trigger images of greatness and heighten emotions at the mere mention of it, not the opposite.




[Dis]Honourable Mentions: 


Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole: this animated movie about talking, warring owls is actually great. The title, though, is way too long and meaningless. The series of books it’s based on is called Guardians of Ga’Hoole. They could’ve went with that, or, just Legend of the Guardians, but instead they tried to mash the two, and it didn’t work out so well. Pretty sure everyone just calls it “That Owl Movie” now. 


The Constant Gardener: I’ll give this title points for being memorable, because I remember hearing it as a kid and just thinking, “what does that even mean?” This guy is just always gardening, I guess. And it’s some kind of dark thriller, so the trailer narrator always said it with that guttural undertone, which just makes it sound even funnier. Not the worst title, but dumb indeed. 


Edge of Tomorrow: the little Tom Cruise/Emily Blunt sci-fi actioner that could (kind of), but what it couldn’t do was decide on a title. Edge of Tomorrow sounds like a soap opera, the subtitle “Live. Die. Repeat.” Was half-adapted as its new title on home video, and the original title, All You Need Is Kill (which is what the book is called that it’s based on) sounds better than either of those other two. 


Sssssss: is that with six “S”’s or seven? I guess all the other snake movie titles had been used up? At least they got the right match of animal to sound effect. Fun fact: look this title up on YouTube and you’ll get all kinds of weird, interesting, and disturbing results (beyond just the movie). 


Freddy Got Fingered: straight-up sounds like a porn title. A horrible title, but the movie itself is horrible, so, I can’t say it’s one of the worst titles ever. They give you a fair warning that it’s bad with the title itself. If you decide to watch it based on that, Godspeed. 




10. I Still Know What You Did Last Summer
 

Starting off with a doozy. First of all, I Know What You Did Last Summer probably only exists because of the success of Scream (both movies written by the same screenwriter), which rekindled interest in the slasher genre, but Scream is one of those excellent one-word titles that’s ambiguous enough to be intriguing but also telling enough to indicate the genre. I Know What You Did Last Summer is almost a spoiler? I guess? But then tacking on “Still” for the sequel just makes it sound worse, and makes it even more too long. The third film, I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer, is pretty bad too, but after the first and second title, is it really a surprise?   


9. Gigli 



I’m still not sure how to say this one. Looks like giggly? All I know is it doesn’t tell you a damn thing about the movie, but it didn’t really matter back when it came out in 2003, because everyone knew it was a rom-com starring then-real-life-couple Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck (A.K.A Bennifer). The movie ended up being one of the worst of all-time, according to many critics, which I can’t attest to that, having never seen it, as a connoisseur of titles, I agree it’s one of the worst in that respect. 


8. 2 Fast, 2 Furious
 

The Fast and Furious franchise has a weird history of titles, but this second one is the dumbest to me. Okay, to be fair, at least it indicates it’s the second movie, unlike entries #3 (Fast and Furious: Tokyo Drift) and #4 (Fast and Furious, dropping “the” and “the”), but it has to say “2” two times? I’m no math expert but doesn’t that add up to four? It just sounds like a parody title. 


7. eXistenZ



Go home, movie title, you’re drunk. Fact: misspelling a word doesn’t come off as clever. I’ve never actually seen this David Cronenberg body horror film, but would like to, based on the premise—not so much based on the title. It’s one thing to misspell a word, but to throw in some capitals for seemingly no reason? That’s crossing the line. 


6. Blacula/Blackenstein  


I’m putting both of these movies in, even though they aren’t connected in any way, except that they both have black actors in the lead roles and are Blaxploitation movies with horribly racist titles. Blacula even had a sequel, Scream Blacula Scream (why are you screaming Blacula? Are you upset about the title too?), and was the first in a line of many Blaxploitation horror movies. Subbing out part of a famous title with “Black” just for marketability isn’t creative and isn’t okay with me.  


5. The Dark Knight Rises



You might be surprised to see this one on here, but it’s bugged me ever since I heard it announced—in fact, it’s the whole reason I came up with this list. I was and still am puzzled by this title choice, given that it’s nearly identical to the second entry in the trilogy, only with Rises added at the end. But really, didn’t the titular Dark Knight “rise” in the second movie, more than he did in the third? Why didn’t they just go with The Dark Knight Returns, like the comic book title? Or what about Batman Ends? It was common knowledge this would be the last of the three Nolan Batman movies, and the first one was called Batman Begins, now it ends! But no, they went with a repetitious, lame title that, ironically enough, kind of mirrored what the movie ended up being: repetitious from last time, and lame compared to the previous entry. 


4. Terminator Genisys


Now we’re getting into really terrible title territory (say that ten times fast). As I’ve already said, spelling a word wrong in a title was never cool, and never will be cool. This was the first sign of trouble for the Terminator sequel/reboot/remake (remakequelboot?) and the jokes at this title’s expense ended up being the best things about the movie. Terminator: Jenny Smith, Terminator: Genishit, and Terminator: Mega Drive are my personal favourites. 


3. John Carter


Disney threw a lot of money into this [supposed-to-have-been] blockbuster based on Edgar Rice Burroughs’s famous sci-fi adventure novels of yesteryear, but they screwed up on one major thing: the marketing. The trailers for this movie made it look like a tiny amount of greatness trapped inside a storm of cgi garbage, and the final nail in the coffin was changing the title from John Carter of Mars (as shown at the end before the credits) to just John Carter (as shown on every piece of marketing). The thought being “of Mars” would turn people off, when really, it probably would’ve brought in more people, because John Carter sounds like it could be about some guy from anywhere, doing anything. It’s way too broad. The movie bombed hard, even though it actually wasn’t that bad, and I think the title is largely to blame.  


2. Troll 2


This title is deceptively stupid. You might be thinking, hey, c’mon, what’s wrong with this? On the surface? Nothing. But give the movie a watch, and you’ll discover this really is one of the worst movies ever made, and while many will say it’s one of the best worst movies ever (so bad it’s good) it’s mostly just boring. But the first big fail is that there are no trolls in the movie. They’re called Goblins. And the second big fail, is it has nothing to do with the first Troll movie. So this basic movie title essentially fails at everything. It just doesn’t seem like it, upon first look. 


1. Star Wars titles 


Before you unceremoniously shoot me with your blaster like Han did Greedo in the un-altered edition of Episode IV, let me preview this by clarifying this is in no way me dissing the Star Wars movies. I’m not even hating on the prequels here. All I’m saying, is the Star Wars series does not sport the best titles. This is more about quantity than quality. None of the titles are really horrible, but as a single series of films, there sure are a lot of bad ones. Let’s start at the beginning. The original 1977 classic came out as Star Wars, but was later given the subtitle A New Hope to distinguish it among the franchise. A New Hope? Okay, a little vague, but not bad I guess. Then there was The Empire Strikes Back, which is pretty good, but then the title became Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back. A bit long winded, isn’t it? Then it just became a thing. Return of the Jedi becomes Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi. Okay, fine, it’s a thing now (and Return of the Jedi is a solid title, by the way). But then there were the prequels. The Phantom Menace? Nope, there wasn’t really a phantom, and he wasn’t really a menace. Or did I just miss something? It’s so dense, I know. Attack of the Clones? Well the clones didn’t really attack until the end…Revenge of the Sith? Unless you’re already deep into Star Wars the Sith getting revenge is pretty much meaningless.  

I know these titles don’t really matter, and it’s just George Lucas paying tribute to the old adventure serials that inspired him in the first place, but titles are important, and just the title Star Wars is perfect on its own, there isn’t really a need for the additional titles. Imagine if it was just Star Wars I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, etc. and that’s it. What’s wrong with that?

Does the Star Wars series deserve this top spot for worst movie title? Probably not, so I’ll throw one more in as a bonus.


The REAL #1 worst movie title:  



The 41 Year-Old Virgin Who Knocked Up Sarah Marshall and Felt Superbad About It 


This title is absurd. Spoof titles don’t really need to be works of art, they just have to sum up what the movie is spoofing. Superhero Movie. Date Movie. Airplane! Scary Movie made use of the original title given to Scream. Occasionally you get a clever one like The Naked Gun. But this way-too-long-winded amalgamation of Judd Apatow comedy titles? It reeks of desperation and completely lacks any creativity. Worst. Movie Title. Ever.