WEEK 2: SLITHERING SERPENTS
Anaconda (1997) Review
Before low-budget snake movies became endlessly produced for
the B-movie community, Columbia Pictures brought together a decent budget and a
handful of capable actors, and produced a theatrically-released, honest-attempt
at a killer snake film. Anaconda is
largely responsible for the influx of killer animal films in the late 1990’s
and early 2000’s (especially all the snake movies) and is partly why I love the
amazon rainforest and wish to one day travel there. However, for most people,
this movie will probably make them want to do the opposite.
The film opens with a man (played by none other than Machete himself, Danny Trejo) being
pursued by an anaconda on his shipwrecked boat. It cuts to documentary director
Terri (Jennifer Lopez) and her team, including, among others, lead cameraman Danny
(Ice Cube), British narrator/host Westridge (Jonathan Hyde), and sound
technician Gary (Owen Wilson, for some reason), who join South American tribe
expert Dr. Cale (Eric Stoltz) on a journey through the Amazon to film the
Shirishama natives, but their expedition hits an unexpected speed bump when
they pick up kooky snake hunter Serone (Jon Voight), who, as it turns out, has been
pursuing the anaconda that killed Danny Trejo in the beginning, and intends to
capture it, by any means necessary.
Before the film begins, there’s an ominous paragraph about
anacondas in red scrolling text over a black background that reads as follows:
“Tales of monstrous, man-eating anacondas have been recounted for centuries by tribes
people of the amazon basin, some of whom are said to worship these giant
snakes.
“Anacondas are among the most ferocious—and enormous—creatures
on earth, growing, in certain cases, as long as 40 feet. Unique among snakes,
they are not satisfied after eating a victim. They will regurgitate their prey
in order to kill and eat again.” While that might not all be scientifically accurate,
it makes for a great killer animal premise, and Anaconda, as far as I’m concerned, is the best giant snake movie
out there.
Most of the time with killer animal films, I don’t even
bother listing characters’ names or the actors portraying them, either because
the actors aren’t well known, or the characters are insignificant to the story.
However, with these more mainstream productions, the acting talent is usually
part of the draw, and that is certainly the case here. It’s hard to imagine
J-Lo and Ice Cube fighting a giant snake nowadays, but it was a different time
back in 1997. By the higher standards of a general thriller or horror film, the
characters are one-dimensional and the acting is mediocre, but it’s great by
killer snake movie standards. J-Lo is mostly there for eye candy, Ice Cube is
charismatic and funny as usual, but poor Eric Stoltz gets the short end of the
stick, because his character gets hurt early on and is out of action for about two-thirds of the movie. First Eric Stoltz almost gets cast as
Marty McFly in Back to the Future,
but that falls through, then he stars in the inferior sequel to David
Cronenberg’s The Fly, then he’s in Mask but is all covered in makeup and
prosthetics, and then he gets the most forgettable part in Anaconda! This guy can’t catch a break.
Back when Anaconda
first came out, no one probably thought much of Owen Wilson starring in it, but
watching it now and knowing the other films he’s been in, it’s like seeing the
other wedding crasher, Vince Vaughn, in The
Lost World: Jurassic Park; he just totally takes me out of the movie. The
other side characters are fine—Jonathan Hyde is hilarious as the grumpy documentary
host, playing golf on the boat and whining about Ice Cube’s rap tunes—but the
character I have the biggest problem with is Serone. He’s introduced very
suddenly, though pretty early on, and Jon Voight plays the role a little too
silly. He’s always squinting and leering at everyone, with an accent that
reminds me of Tommy Wiseau’s (but not quite that bad) and the hints that he
might be a bad guy are not subtle.
Speaking of bad guys, Serone may be the human antagonist,
but what about the reptilian one? In the same way as Jaws, Anaconda takes a
top predator few people understand, and exaggerates it for maximum fright, and
it works. Early in the movie a panther gets ambushed and squeezed to death, and
its eye is shown to have popped out from the crushing pressure. It indicates
the anaconda really is the top predator here, and much like the opening
paragraph, is a tease of what they can do to the characters. Luckily, the movie
fulfills those promises, and the third act is full of snake action, more so
than the slower first and second acts.
But there’s more than just snakes and Serone to worry about.
The environment is hostile and unpredictable, there are poisonous insects, and
there’s even a catfish that’ll swim up your...you know what, just watch the
movie to hear the explanation. And believe it or not, there’s more to like in
this movie than just the killer snake scenes. Anaconda is actually quite well directed and reasonably suspenseful
in the first two acts. It has good cinematography which brings the jungle to
life, making it look beautiful and dangerous. The music is great as well,
though nowhere near as memorable of a score as something like Jaws.
The special effects are pretty good, but they aren’t
flawless. The snake cgi is okay in about half the shots it’s used in, but in
the other half, it blends poorly with the background and/or actors. The
animatronics look good, but their movements are a little stiff at times, and a
couple close-ups of just the head make it look like a robot instead of a living
creature. However, there are a couple innovative ideas utilized when the snake
eats some people. The cgi and the animatronics don’t mesh too well, but it’s
not the worst I’ve seen.
Maybe it’s because I’ve seen a million of these killer
animal films (and I can understand why many people detest this one), but I
think Anaconda is among the higher
ranking entries in the sub-genre. It takes itself seriously, but still manages
to be fun, and is much more re-watchable than the majority of killer
snake films. Unlike that large majority, it doesn’t go for the stupid
sequel-setup-ending, but it got a sequel anyway. Check out my review for the
second Anaconda film tomorrow!
No comments:
Post a Comment