Scream 3 (2000) Review
Almost without fail, slasher franchises succumb to
diminishing returns. Even the best of them do. What you need to know up front
about Scream 3 is, this is definitely
the worst of the Scream movies, but
it isn’t all bad.
The story starts out with Cotton Weary, now a famous TV
host, being murdered by the Ghostface killer. Who is the killer this time? Gale
Weathers and Dewey are on the case again; this time they’re led to the set of Stab 3, where Dewey is a consultant on
the film, and dating the actress who plays Gale. Awkward. Sidney is living a
quiet existence as a counsellor for a teen help line with a fake name and
little contact with the outside world, but she’s pulled into the drama once
again after one of Stab 3’s actresses
is killed, and the production is shut down for the investigation.
The two main problems I have with Scream 3 is the choice of setting for the story, and the reduction
of Sidney’s role in said story. Sidney is the character who drove the first two
movies, but in 3, there are large
portions of the film where she isn’t present, despite the story still trying to
hinge on her importance. There is a lot more time devoted to Gale and Dewey,
who are annoying once again, but made even more annoying by the actress playing
Gale constantly tagging along. She is unbearable at times, and is one example
of a sin the previous movies didn’t commit: making characters unlikable to the
point where the audience wants to see
them killed.
The setting being a Hollywood film set takes the meta
narrative to a new level of meta that, for me, is just too far in the wrong
direction. I like how they skipped over showing us Stab 2 and went straight to Stab
3, just so they could have even more trilogy clichés addressed. Only
problem is, they didn’t comment on how the third one is never that good. The scene when Jenny McCarthy’s character is
reading lines over the phone with the director and it turns into the usual
killer-taunting-the-victim-on-the-phone cliché is just so predictable and stale.
And that’s how a lot of this movie comes off: we’ve seen this sort of thing
before, only done better. They go as far as to blow up a house at one point to
make it seem scarier! But it doesn’t work.
I’ll give credit where credit’s due: Scream 3 does do some
things right. The way a certain fan favourite character is brought back at one
point is pretty clever and satisfying, and is easily my favourite part of the
whole movie. There’s a part where Sidney is chased through the film set of her
Woodsboro home, and there a couple clever moments with the unpredictability of
the set design, and some interesting camera moves. I credit all of these positives
to director Wes Craven, who still makes the most of the sub-par script. Kevin
Williamson, who wrote the first two movies, didn’t write this one, it was
written by Ehren Kruger, who wrote all of the Transformers sequels. Honestly, I’m surprised Scream 3 wasn’t worse, with that guy writing it.
I won’t ruin the twist at the end, but I have to address it.
First off, I don’t think the movie needed a twist, but this is Scream, so everything has to be
connected, character-wise. The reveal doesn’t feel as genuinely shocking and
plausible as the one from Scream 2,
and of course is nothing compared to the original, but I don’t hate it. The
first time I saw it, I was still genuinely surprised. It lacks the necessary
setup throughout to truly pay off, but it isn’t completely dumb, either.
Behind-the-scenes (like, actually behind-the-scenes of the
real movie), there were troubles with the film’s development, what with the
Columbine High School Massacre having just occurred, and concerns that films of
this nature were partly to blame. The studio had the violence toned down, which
is extremely obvious, given how underwhelming the death scenes are, and the
overall change of focus from actual horror to dumb humour and jokes is
disappointing, but if the latter is what you really liked about the previous
movies, maybe there’s more to like about this one.
It’s also a bit uncomfortable to watch nowadays, because
Lance Henriksen plays a film producer who, as we find out later in the movie,
forced actresses to have to sex with him back in the day so they would get good
parts, which we now know was really going on all along in real life with Harvey
Weinstein. Scream 3 was distributed
by Dimension Films, which was owned by The Weinstein Company at that time.
Scream 3 begs to
be taken as seriously as Scream and Scream 2, but when you have cameos like
Carrie Fisher as a secretary with attention drawn to her looking like Carrie
Fisher, and Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes as Jay and Silent Bob, I just can’t. It
tries to be funnier, but isn’t, it tries to be scarier, but isn’t, and tries to
conclude the series on an epic note, but doesn’t. However, I wouldn’t say skip
this one entirely. If you really liked the first two, I think it’s still worth
watching at least once.
No comments:
Post a Comment